Wednesday 5 February 2014

Characteristics of Larkin so far...



















After reading 13 of Larkin's poems in the volume, here is a summary of what we think so far.  I've added my own ideas to yours. Please continue your own summary so far on your own blog:




Subject Matter

Contemporary (60s) life – observations on mundane details of life and people-watching
Place - rooted in real locations which have significance for Larkin
Time – Time slipping away.  Element of regret about life changing decisions – points at which life could change forever.
Youth - full of promise, hope and expectation for greatness
Expectations  - can lead to disappointments, unfulfilment - looking back with perspective
Age – he voices unsayable hatred of old age – perhaps shrouding fear of own ageing.
Death - inevitable, not to be feared
Change/Mutability – England is changing (not for the better) Present (“progress”) encroaching on older (better?) ways of life.
Family - relationships, loss, love - parents seen from middle-age
Love, Marriage and/or Sex – ability to see potential for greatness in marital union, but also base desire for sexual instinct to reproduce, difficulty of ultimate commitment - marriage a trap?
Life Choices - Fate or free will? – are lives products of our existential choices or determined by destiny, genes, our upbringing etc? Inevitability of age, regret etc.
Isolation - being an outsider, not conforming to the "norm"
Doubt - comparing self with others - who made the better life choices?
Hope – that out of something ritualistic or stripped of meaning or seemingly negative something good can come
Music/creative idols - passion for jazz - an escape, a "truth" in music.  Timeless - triggers memories of younger selves

Loss - of naivety, of loved ones, of youth

Attitudes expressed

Relationships, marriage love – against them personally (?) - they hold you back/tie you down? but aware that they do suit some people
Being alone – not a bad thing, but offers possibilities for greater clarity
Accept life decisions made - no point in regretting
Other people – rather negative and disparaging about their ignorance and lack of vision
Dislikes artificiality and falsity or show and pretence (modern life again) - a realist?
Against organised religion – cynical.
Hope expressed at end of poems – assertion of what’s good out of something which initially seems negative/mundane to him
Philosophical - big ideas about human existence, reflective
Melancholy, pessimism (?) - glass half-empty?
Atheist/agnostic ? - but knowledgeable about faith and belief in others

Speaker

First person (a persona not necessarily Larkin – make this clear)
An onlooker – isolated from what he observes but able to see it more clearly
Disparaging about those with “normal” lives
A somewhat superior tone, sometimes angry or bitter (?) 
Sometimes compassionate though and aware that other interpretations than his own have validity - he may be wrong
Reflective - introvert - nostalgic?



Structure of poems

Initially: Detailed concrete observation of everyday experience in often simpler language
Then: Movement towards less concrete more abstract and metaphoric observations with more overt judgements about what observing – more complex language
Finally: A more expansive philosophical observation on some part of human existence – usually 
paradoxical in nature. An 
epiphany at the end – a sudden realisation of a grand thought. Often ambiguous language or open-ended.
Rhyme, rhythm , structure varied from poem to poem – to suit individual poem’s ideas
Shows flexibility and virtuosity of poet

Style

Vocabulary – wide and varied, carefully chosen for connotations but sometimes reproduces colloquial, contemporary expressions.  Not specialist or archaic except for effect.  Can be very erudite and learned - huge scope of cultural allusion/reference
Technically very sophisticated:
Use of sound effects for emphasis (of eg speed, heat): alliteration, assonance
Use of connotative language
Use of cumulative listing devices to suggest weariness,
Use of compound adjective to collide ideas in efficient way
Use of rhetorical cadences (eg groups of threes) to reach crescendo or diminuendo
Sparing use of imagery when dealing with the abstract ideas reached by end of poem – metaphor, simile, personification, anthropomorphization
Sophisticated rhyming structures, but use of enjambment and caesura often hides them, deflecting monotony and communicating rhythms of everyday speech
Use of the conceit – metaphysical: a startling or unusual comparison which takes us onto a completely different level of ideas
Use of paradox and rhetorical devices which suggest paradox (oxymoron)
Use of bathos – anticlimax to suggest mundanity or humour or condescension

Use of pathetic fallacy – heat to suggest stifling repetition

Tuesday 4 February 2014

Mr Bleaney


"How we live measures our own nature"


  • To what extent do you think this is true?
  • How much do you think you can tell about someone from the kind of place they live in and the things they have in their home? 
  • What would your room tell us about you?

Here's an audio of Philip Larkin reading the poem himself

And you might like this which is a version of the poem with hyperlinks taking your to explanations and analyses of particular details in the poem.
Link to hypertext version of poem

Once you have studied the poem, consider what other critics have said about his poems:



  • 'The typical structure of [Larkin's] poems ... [is] a debate between hope and hopelessness, between fulfillment and disappointment'. 
  • Andrew Motion, 'Philip Larkin and Symbolism', in Philip Larkin: Contemporary Critical Essays, ed. by Stephen Regan (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1997), p. 43.

  • 'Larkin sought out these uninspiring places because for him they weren't uninspiring but settings appropriate to the kind of poems he wrote'. 
  • Alan Bennett, 'Alas! Deceived', in Writing Home (London: Faber & Faber, 1997 ed.), p. 565.

  • '[The] gaps and silences [in Larkin's work] hinted at deep and unresolved conflicts in the writer's private life'. 
  • Stephen Regan, 'Larkin's Reputation', in Larkin with Poetry: English Association Conference Papers, ed. by Michael Baron (Leicester: English Association, 1997), p. 49.

  • '[Larkin] just couldn't connect ... Better to remain solitary, alienated, than to endure the pain of human entanglements'.
  • Terry Eagleton, quoted in Gary Kissick, 'They turn on Larkin', in 'The Antioch Review, Winter 1994'

  • 'Larkin's poems seem to come to us very appealingly as the expression of a personality disclosing itself with self-deprecating honesty' 
  • (from Andrew Swarbrick's essay 'Larkin's Identities', in Regan, Stephen ed. (1997) Philip Larkin: Contemporary Critical Essays, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • To what extent do you agree or disagree with their views of the poems you have studied so far?
  • Love and Death in Hull 2003

    There is a more recent documentary about Larkin's life called Love and Death in Hull.  it was made after Larkin's death in 2003, so is a good overview of all his work.

    Larkin on film

    You might like to see this famous documentary, Monitor,  featuring Philip Larkin which was made in 1964.  In it, the poet is interviewed by John Betjeman (the poet laureate of the day) in a series of locations in and around Hull, and Wikipedia suggests the following:

    (the programme) allowed Larkin to play a significant part in the creation of his own public persona; one he would prefer his readers to imagine.

    It is in three parts on You Tube and you can play them one after the other.